Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
 
A blog about films. Not celebrities. Not (necessarily) reviews. More likely just assorted news, and my deranged ranting.....

How vital is a Director to a film's Quality?

June 3rd 2008 01:11
OK, I realise that the heading is pretty loaded, so let me explain. Certain directors have a very distinct style that makes them unique, Tarantino's work, for example, is full of stylized violence. Also I'm talking here specifically about respected and quality directors, I don't doubt the Uwe Boll could turn any classic script into a steaming pile of crap.

But much of the time content seems to be one of the major differences between directors. Scorsese for example has a hard on for Gangster/Underworld movies, both Italian and Irish-American (and who can blame him), see Taxi Driver, The Departed, The Goodfellas, Gangs of New York etc. Peter Jackson (at least his Hollywood work, I don't know his old stuff) is all about epic scenes, as demonstrated by the Lord of the Rings', King Kong and his interest in doing Halo and Temeraire). The Wachowski brothers do crazy computer special effects laden pop-culture epitaths.


But how much better or worse would say the Godfathers have been if Scorsese directed them? Or if Jackson had directed Star Wars? What if James Cameron did Jaws or Speilberg did Aliens?

Again I realise certain directors with very distinct stylistic preferences could significantly alter a movie, but for a quality director with a quality script how much would really change?
72
Vote
Shared on


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
8 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Cibbuano

June 3rd 2008 02:39
well, if you believe in the auteur theory, it's all about the director.

Personally, I'm a huge fan of filmmaking by directors that submerge themselves into their work.

Big budget Hollywood movies are not as free, unfortunately, as the producers and marketers often have a lot of control over the final product... as witnessed by the god-awful, blasphemous remake of "I Am Legend".

Comment by S.L. Bradish

June 3rd 2008 03:26
As you pointed out, Geoff, some directors are drawn to certain types of scripts. Putting together the right combination can result in a great movie. Some directors are just not able to translate the pages to the screen with style and flair, and some are. Speculation and "what if's" about directors are much like those about actors. Interesting, but can drive you crazy if you let it! lol

Comment by David O'Connell

June 3rd 2008 05:08
I'm sure all those directors would have left slightly different but just as distinctive individual marks on all those films. Any fillmmaker whose given enough creative control over a period of time to leave an imprint on their work is worth watching, but of course it's becoming less likely all the time within the mainstream American system.

There are promising young directors getting bought by Hollywood all the time, now making films that anyone could make in exactly the same way - they don't have any control over the final product anyway, and if they think they do, then it's only an illusion of control.

Look at Bryan Singer's early work as one example - Public Access, The Usual Suspects and even Apt Pupil - as compared to his made-by-committee movies XMen, X2 and Superman Returns. Personally I think his talents are being wasted and he's not the only one.

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 3rd 2008 13:22
id like to see a Woody Allen remake of Titanic!

actually in all seriousness you only have to look at film sequels to see the impact a director makes . . .

Ridley Scott made Alien a sci-fi suspense drama while James Cameron made Aliens into a high octane action flick

David Fincher (The Game, Seven, Fight Club) did Alien 3 and it is dark and grusome

Alien 4 was practically a comedy

Comment by Cibbuano

June 3rd 2008 21:26
morgan, I'd like to see a Woody Allen directed Alien sequel! "Alien 5: Everything you wanted to know about killer parasitic aliens, but were afraid to ask"

Comment by Geoff Egan

June 3rd 2008 23:35
Woody Allen? Aliens? I'd probably shoot myself.

Morgan, despite how excellent Seven and Fight Club are, Alien 3 sucked epically. Epically.

Comment by Morgan Bell

June 4th 2008 04:57
haha woody allen could explore the inner neurosis of the alien over dinner at a new york restaurant . . . the alien could explain her sexual disfunctions and relationship with her parents

i agree, alien 3 wasnt much chop compared to the original

Comment by Cibbuano

June 4th 2008 22:56
In fact, let's just ignore everything after "Aliens".


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts
33 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Geoff Egan's Blogs

912 Vote(s)
14 Comment(s)
17 Post(s)
Moderated by Geoff Egan
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]